Loading trending news...
Loading latest jobs...
Your HVAC fails on a Friday in July. The facilities team sends an emergency request. Two weeks later, nobody's fixed anything because nobody agreed who could approve emergency spending. Or you get three completely different quotes from three contractors because the scope was so vague. Or work starts without insurance on file.
That's what happens when procurement has no process.
A procurement process is a sequence. You identify what you need. You write a scope so suppliers know what you're buying. You pick a sourcing method (RFQ, RFP, direct sourcing). You check that suppliers are real. You get responses. You evaluate them. You get approvals. You finalize the contract. You hand it off to operations. You watch performance. You decide whether to renew.
That's it. Eleven steps.
Property procurement is messier than general procurement. You have multiple locations. Different buildings. Different systems. Recurring maintenance. Local supplier availability. Different approval limits. You can't just hire anyone to work on electrical systems or hazmat. You need licenses. Insurance. Documented experience.
The goal is consistency without being rigid. You know when to take shortcuts and when not to.
Compare these:
"The building needs HVAC support."
"Four office buildings need quarterly preventive HVAC maintenance, a four-hour emergency response window, and monthly parts availability."
The first creates guesswork. The second lets suppliers price it.
When someone submits a requirement, document the problem, which properties, required outcome, and timeline. Done.
One property manager I worked with had chronic late arrivals from their HVAC vendor. When they finally specified "four-hour response," the new vendor they selected had technicians stationed nearby. Different supplier entirely. Different cost structure.
A bad scope breaks everything downstream.
Write exactly what the service is. Which properties and how many. Technical specs if they matter. Service frequency. Deadlines. How the supplier reports. What you'll accept.
Be specific enough that three suppliers respond to the same thing. Don't prescribe how they do it. You want their approach, not your assumption.
If you say "quarterly filter replacement," suppliers compete on price and response time. If you say "Merv-13 filters only," you've removed a variable. If you say "monthly written reports," you've set the expectation.
Use the right tool for the situation.
Existing supplier? Recurring, proven work. Fastest.
Direct sourcing? Limited qualified suppliers. Justified by experience or licensing.
RFI? New territory. Understand what's possible before scoping.
RFQ? Clear need, price comparison. Straightforward.
RFP? Complex requirement, multiple solutions. Evaluate approaches, not just cost.
Competitive procurement? Market rates, multiple suppliers. Prevents favoritism.
Emergency? Roof leaking into servers. Call someone today. Document why you skipped process. "Roof was leaking" is enough.
Before you ask them to bid, verify they can actually do the work.
Can they service all your locations? Do they have required licenses? Insurance? Capacity? References from similar work?
This is yes/no questions. Not scoring. Not weighted matrices. Can they or can't they?
If someone fails a yes/no test, they don't move forward.
Every supplier gets identical information simultaneously.
Set a specific deadline. Many procurement teams answer supplier questions and don't share the answers. Don't do that.
Supplier A asks something substantive? Answer in writing. Share with all bidders. Everyone has the same intel. This is fair and protects you from claims of misunderstanding later.
Keep responses confidential. Don't tell supplier A what supplier B bid. Once the deadline passes, stop accepting new information. If you change criteria after responses arrive, you've restarted the process for everyone.
Start with mandatory requirements. If the scope says "must be HVAC-certified" and someone isn't, they're out.
Then: Do they understand your properties? Can they deliver what they promised? Timeline realistic? Pricing reasonable?
For major claims, ask them to prove it. They say four-hour response? Ask for examples. Say 15% energy savings? Ask how.
Write down why you're picking one supplier over another. You won't remember six months later. Your notes matter.
Depending on your organization, approvals might come from property, procurement, budget, legal, security, owner, or risk/insurance.
Value and risk determine how many layers. A $1,200 pest contract? Property and budget. A $180,000 three-year cleaning contract? All of them.
Own the workflow. One missing signature delays you weeks.
Before signing, confirm:
Final scope and changes from the bid. Clear responsibilities. Service levels and response times. How they report. Pricing and payment terms. Start and end dates. Renewal and notice provisions. Escalation. Insurance. How changes get handled.
Write it so both parties know what's expected. If it says "24 hours," it means 24 hours.
This is where most guides stop. Real estate procurement doesn't.
The contract is signed. Now they actually have to work. This requires:
Supplier onboarding with your property teams. Access arrangements. Named contacts. Initial schedule. Reporting format. Tenant communication if needed. Baseline expectations.
A cleaning company can't just show up. They need to know which doors unlock when, parking, who's in charge, and who they call if something breaks.
A poorly executed handover creates friction every week.
Once work starts, verify they're doing what they agreed.
Did they show up when promised? Quality acceptable? Response time met? Reports submitted? Invoice accuracy? Property feedback? Corrective actions when something breaks?
Most organizations fail here. They sign and ignore until something breaks. Six months in, the supplier has drifted, quality is slipping, nothing's documented.
Simple: Did they complete the work? Report as required? Quality acceptable? Yes or no. Track it. When you see a pattern, address it.
Sixty days before the contract ends, trigger a renewal decision.
Review their actual performance (check your notes). Does the requirement still exist? Terms still work? Did scope change?
Decide: renew, renegotiate, replace, or close.
Keep records. You need them for renewals, for what-happened questions, and for compliance.
Vague scopes. "Maintain the building." Three contractors, three interpretations.
Missing approval authority. Nobody agreed in advance who approves what. Facilities approves, then procurement wants a review, then legal wants changes. Four weeks wasted.
Different information to suppliers. Supplier A gets one scope. Supplier B gets an edited version. They bid different services.
Undocumented decisions. Why did you pick supplier A? If someone asks in six months, you can't remember.
Contracting delays. You choose a supplier in March. Contracting sends the agreement in May. Supplier loses interest.
Weak handover. Contract signed, you tell them where the keys are, hope they figure it out.
No performance tracking. Service degrades. You're months into a three-year contract before you notice.
Missed renewal deadlines. Contract renews automatically. You never revisited it.
Requirement documented
Budget confirmed
Scope written and approved
Sourcing method chosen
Suppliers prequalified
Responses recorded by deadline
Evaluation documented
Approvals done
Agreement signed with no ambiguity
Supplier onboarded with clear handover
Performance monitored through contract term
Renewal decision scheduled
Can I skip stages?
No. But you can move fast. Emergency procurement compresses scoping and sourcing to one day. Routine renewals can skip sourcing if you're keeping the same supplier. The sequence stays.
What's the difference between procurement and purchasing?
Procurement is the whole process from "we need something" to "we're satisfied with what we got." Purchasing is one transaction: placing an order. Real estate procurement includes performance monitoring. Most organizations skip that part.
RFQ or RFP?
RFQ when it's clear and you're comparing prices. RFP when you want different approaches. Maintenance contract? RFQ. Solution to a complex problem? RFP.
Who approves?
Define thresholds in advance. Small contracts: property approval. Large contracts: property, procurement, budget, legal, security, owner, risk. Make it clear beforehand so you don't stall waiting.
Does it end when the contract is signed?
No. That's when you start. Performance monitoring and renewal prep is where you get actual value.
